Soapbox

The Reflex: This Just In: You’re a Terrible Mother—and You’re Going to Die

Why can’t we get through a week without a scare-tactic headline or published study that tells us how royally we’re screwing up? By Heather Wood Rudúlph and Athena D. Williams


breastfeedingIt was only a matter of time that breastfeeding was linked to cancer. The American Institute for Cancer Research recommended in a recent report that women breast-feed exclusively for up to six months. Evidence shows that women who breast-feed are less likely to develop breast cancer later on, it said. Plus, breast-fed children are at a reduced risk of developing the fat cells that contribute to the onset of cancer.

Yes, the cancer card.

It’s not enough for me to have to worry about Ahmadinejad possessing nuclear capabilities, or the creepy guy at the gym who keeps sneaking peeks at my ass, or that two fat birds can take down a multi-ton plane. And let’s not forget the economy. Now I’m supposed to worry about getting breast cancer because I didn’t breast-feed my child for the recommended amount of time?

That neurosis is going to have to take a number. Right now I’m thinking I might need therapy before I’m able to fly again. I’ll get to worrying about dropping dead of breast cancer because I failed my child in about six or seven years — if I’m still alive. In the mean time: Don’t call me, I’ll call you.

The hysteria is constant; the content is interchangeable. There’s always the next thing to worry about. Studies never stop showing … something scary. And, all of this anxiety can’t be good for the developing mind. Which makes me wonder: What is the cost of molding a perfect child?

Sixty years ago, Dr. Kenneth Clark conducted an experiment on the psychological effects of segregation on black children. The main part of his research involved dolls. An overwhelming number of the black children in the study preferred the while doll to her black counterpart. It was a widely publicized study that led to the banishment of the white doll from the standard black household.

After Raggedy Ann and Andy, I never received another white doll. Cue violins. I never had a Barbie, but, God, I loved her. I wanted her to come and play with me so bad. At least once a week, I would sneak into the neighborhood toy store to hold the box; I’d run my fingers up and down over the plastic. I was insanely jealous of my friends who had her. I’d spend the entire visit acting out scenarios that involved the two of us. The friend was inconsequential in my fantasy mind; it was Barbie I was interested in getting to know.

To appease me, my parents bought me a black-Barbie-doll-like family. They looked like sharecroppers. I was supposed to imagine them going on great adventures and having passionate sex? No one wants to fantasize about sharecroppers having sex.

I revisited my unrequited love for Barbie when I had my daughter. She had every color Barbie, as well as the house, camera, and the pink Volkswagen bug. When she outgrew them, together we collected all 20 naked Barbies and donated them to the Salvation Army. That day, I was finally able to say goodbye without bitterness in my heart.

I understand why my parents made their decision regarding black dolls. They were trying to do the right thing because the study said so. But they were incapable of seeing past their rigid ideology to understand that I didn’t want to be white, I just wanted a Barbie. So, in honor of that little girl who still lives inside of me, I’m making a conscious choice to step back from the hysteria.

I’m tired of feeling like a terrible parent every time I turn on the television or open a newspaper. The breast-feeding coalition is just the latest group whose expectations I’ve failed to meet, but there have been plenty of others. The problem is: I have an actual child to raise and sometimes I freak her out. Last week, a “D” on her science exam was all it took for me to picture her as a corner crack-whore in 10 years. It is past time for me to lighten up. The next time she picks a grossly tacky item of clothing from the rack I will try to bite my tongue. In that moment, I hope to remember that the most I can ever ask from my daughter or myself is that we do the best we can.

I really do hope that my failure to breast-feed my child doesn’t result in cancer, for her or for me. There’s no way to know until it happens — or doesn’t. For now, I’ll place the possibility in the back of my mind with the rest of the pronouncements of doom and gloom. But no matter how I raise her, there will always be variables that are out of my control. We live in an unstable world. Sully won’t always be guiding the plane and the fat birds will continue to fly. —ADW

It does seem like every day there’s another reason to not leave the house (or even get out of bed) because something’s lurking that will make us sick, alter our genes, or possibly end our lives. I can take the end-of-days hysteria, as it’s always been just that: hysteria. What really bothers me are all the reports and studies seemingly conducted for the sole purpose of scaring or blaming women.

We’re either terrible would-be mothers because we wait too long to have babies, too ambitious, not ambitious enough, a perfect homemaker who is forced to feel guilty for not putting herself first, or a selfish career bitch who dared to prioritize her life goals above procreation.

The worst are the surveys (or simple critiques) concerning our ability to properly parent (not to mention the forced standard that all women should have — and want — children). I am not yet a mother, but because my ovaries are of baby-making age (another fact — panic! concern! — I am constantly reminded of), I am tuned in to the mommy wars published everywhere from the Time to TMZ.

One breezy blogger on MomLogic (TMZ’s sister site, and it reads just like it) recently found a somewhat ridiculous way to tie race in to breast-feeding. Societal inequities in some minority communities (lack of education, proper formula, healthcare, or cash reserves) notwithstanding, breast-feeding is a mom/child issue, period. The last time a few “experts” and the media intervened in the breast-feeding debate, they turned Baby Boomer mothers into formula feeders for fear of infant mortality or illness linked to breast milk. Now breast-feeding lobbyists insist it’s the only way to produce an intellectually adequate baby.

Many women of my generation were never breast-fed and I don’t think I could pick them out in a lineup, or single them out in an intellectual conversation. The point is: The Borg we call the societal norm shouldn’t dictate any absolute.

I was breast-fed. In fact, my mother breast-fed all six of her children. None of us went to Ivy League schools — which had more to do with lack of Ivy-League funding than Ivy-League smarts. But we grew up normal and comparable to all of our peers, many of whom were raised on formula. My mother is one who would advocate for breast-feeding only. But I reserve the right to make that decision for myself. I’ve heard too many tales from miserable breast-feeding mothers (and have followed the improvements in baby formula) for me to decide, absolutely, what I’ll do.

But my even considering the option to not exclusively breast-feed would incite a fiery debate (go ahead, debate below). Hanna Rosin equates the breastfeeding vs. formula tête-à-tête to gang violence, calling it a turf war in her recent Atlantic Monthly article. In the piece, Rosin recalled her expressing doubt over breast-feeding her third child, citing improvements in formula and lack of time and energy to go through the 24/7 routine again. She was shunned as if she had confessed to beating her children.

It’s another example of “perfect moms” projecting their ideal onto other women: Baby comes first, everything else (happiness, intimacy, a stable marriage or social life) are inconsequential to rearing that ideal child.

No one knows the formula for raising that supposed ideal. Some of our most brilliant minds survived some of the most deplorable conditions (crack houses, sexual abuse, extreme poverty…). Perhaps it’s that very struggle that makes them great. But none of their biographies discuss whether or not their mothers fostered their intellect through breast-feeding. —HWR

How do you feel about breast-feeding: Necessary for proper child-development, or another social standard rooted in peer pressure? Let us know below.

Next on “The Reflex”: Multiracial is the new Black… and White.

Heather Wood Rudúlph is co-founder and editor of SirensMag.com. Athena D. Williams is a writer and teacher in Long Beach, California

For Further Reading: How to Comb Your Black Baby’s Hair, Money, Men & Moral Limits

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

7 Responses to “The Reflex: This Just In: You’re a Terrible Mother—and You’re Going to Die”

  1. Maura Says:

    Thank you for this. I’m 35 and just had my first and only baby, and I am frustrated and baffled by the amount of bullying out there. I formula feed because it was best in my situation and funny, she’s bright, advanced and very healthy. I get sick of it!

  2. Dannie Says:

    Hype doesn’t work too well on me. I hated What to Expect When You’re Expecting. I could only deal with 3 months of breastfeeding, and that was hell on me. I started my child on video games at 3 and there was (GASP!) sugar in his first birthday cake.
    To some, I’m probably a pretty bad parent. Doubtful that those who would judge anyone are perfect. As was mentioned, anything can happen to anyone at anytime. A few ladies in my life that I’ve known with breast cancer have had 2 to 3 kids and breastfed. So….I don’t see the point to getting worked up.

  3. allison Says:

    I don’t have any kids, but my own mother freely admits dosing up me and my brother with “airplane medicine” (a.k.a. Benadryl) when we were kids on cross-country flights. She’d probably get reported to child services today!

  4. Jana Says:

    It’s amazing to me that the ‘cancer scare’ tactic still works.
    Lance Armstrong- picture of health, cancer.
    It’s not like he’s the only one.
    How many times have you heard the ‘it really shocked me’ story about someone who did all they could to avoid it and live a healthy lifestyle and *bam* still get smacked in the face with a diagnosis? We’ve all heard them. Plenty of beer guzzling, red-meat eating, cigar-smoking folks who sit on their hind ends live to see a ripe old age. Not that I’m recommending any of that, of course. It’s just, why can’t people wake up and see that none of us will live forever, nor will our children- we have to make what we have the best we can!
    Sometimes it really is just that simple.

  5. Shylo Says:

    I am a new mother. My daughter is just about two, when I was pregnat with her the big hype was, YOU MUST BREASTFEED. So I went to the class to learn about it and how to do it. They had some helpful info. But the one thing that stood out in my head was “your baby will be less likely to get sick” so I did it for about 6 weeks thinking I am doing something good thing for my baby. Guess what, she gets a cold every other week!

  6. Sexism Shows Up in the Darnedest Places | Sirens Magazine Says:

    [...] giving birth. A new study confirms how bad this is for all of us (let’s hear it for a study that doesn’t blame us for once!), and really, Broadsheet’s Mary Elizabeth Williams says it best: “The thing [...]

  7. Cordula Says:

    This was hysterical, insightful and real. I loved reading it. I actually love breastfeeding, but have gotten the pressure from the other end as well. That seems to happen all the way around. But I think in general people have to let that go. They don’t know why people choose what they do, the difficulty they had and the whole story behind it. So because of this, its best to not make judgments. People who think they are so much better than everyone else, despite what they are doing right, are doing the biggest DIS-service to their children by acting this way! How about a little tolerance and respect for other peoples choices? There are bigger things to worry about, and kids don’t usually love the uptight parenting either. Thanks for this post!

Comments